I did test it using furmark and the heaven benchmarking stuff and i really get more fps and lower gpu temp with gpu tweak compared to msi since like i said earlier, i get higher overclocking numbers with gpu tweak. To test it, run a stress test (for example furmark) and check max clock speed and memory in HWmonitor, it will be indentical no matter what software u use to overclock. It doesnt matter which software you use to overclock your GPU, as it has no impact on overclocking success. did i do something wrong? Thanks in advanced. So i want Your expert opinion, what the hell is happening? i like the MSI because of the on screen monitoring thing so im hoping to keep it. I did not change voltage, power limit and temp limit for both.

at playing games i get 85 degrees max (hotter for lower numbers). The max stable i get is +175 core clock and +350 (half of what i get from gpu tweak) mem clock.

Then i watch youtube about overclocking and 90% of the time people recommend MSI afterburner so i gave it a shot. playing 2 hours a day average on games the temp is at max 75 degrees celcius. GPU: Palit StormX gtx 1060 3gb - single fan (Please don't curse me for getting this card, i'm poor)Ĭpu cooling: CM hyper 212 LED (cpu temp max at 60-65 degrees during gaming)įans: 2 intake fans in front, 1 stock chasis exhaust.Īs i am saying, i wanted to overclock so first installed the asus gpu tweak 2 to overclock my gpu, i get stable +200 core clock and + 700 memory clock. I previously assembled my humble budget PC, and since my budget get me kind of crap things, i need to rely on overclocking gpu.

Overclock cpu msi afterburner